Battling season-induced smallness.

‘Tis the season. There’s eggnog and lights and holiday parties a plenty. Merriment and jingle bells and a gift giving frenzy.

But let’s not forget the annual reports, holiday mailers, mass appeals and, of course, the multitudes of holiday address labels, personalized just for me, to remind me to give, give, give.

There is so much need, and so little time. Tax deadlines are upon us, after all. (See #3, here.)

And doesn’t my mailbox know it. For it is bearing the burdens of the world these days.

And as the junk mail stacks up and mass appeals and data statistics grow, I start to feel so small, small, small. Tiny isn’t just for Tim, after all.

Because amidst the holiday mountain of need, I feel like little more than a mole.

So you can imagine my joy when amidst all the reminders of poverty and need and great, great loss and destruction, I received from a friend a copy of Ode magazine and was reminded, by the story of just a regular guy, that even in the midst of big, big need there is space for small, but significant contributions.

Whew.

And not only that, but the possibility that it’s the smaller scale work that tends to do more good than the big, huge, bureaucratic efforts. At least, that’s Dick Grace’s theory, and he seems to know what he’s doing.

In Ode, he was featured for his very personal approach to his Grace Family Foundation, which accepts only as much money as he can personally oversee in terms of assessing situations and visiting schools and families.

No fancy monitoring and evaluation schemes. No complex matrices of impact. No annual reports.

Just checking up on people to see if their lives are better. “Personal involvement is the key to successful philanthropy,” Grace says in Ode. “It’s like the difference between the millions spent on foreign aid, which often go to waste, and the smaller sums devoted to micro credit—a more small-scale, human, effective means of combating poverty.”

Which makes sense, if the Nobel Prize is any indication. Just ask Muhammed Yunus.

Because when philanthropy is personal, problems don’t have to be seen in terms of their grandeur to warrant funding dollars or attention. They can be talked about in terms of people, in terms of families, in terms of individual lives.

Which is why I like Grace’s philosophy that, “You don’t have to be wealthy to do good. You don’t need just money for philanthropy….People are never too poor or too inexperienced to be effective on their own.”

A welcome reminder this time of year, when my mailbox is housing a mountain of need and I find myself shrinking in the face of it.

Because philanthropy’s primary goal is to make problems smaller, not people.

The "p" word and polite society.

At this week’s Washington Regional Association of Grantmakers Annual Meeting, Ralph Smith, Senior Vice President of the Annie E. Casey Foundation, noted that it seems that it’s not okay to say the “p” (poverty) word in polite society. That it’s right up there with the other “bad” words: politics, race, class, sex.

Only to be discussed in the company of those who love and know us. At home. In the safety of common experience, education and economic status.

Add to this that to talk about poverty you have to address race, class, politics and often sex and gender, and, well, forget it.

I am, of course, smugly convinced that this doesn’t apply to me, as a bold, concerned citizen who speaks her mind.

And then I remember all the times friends from Africa have asked me direct questions about race or poverty while walking down Washington, D.C. streets. Sometimes they loudly use phrases like, “Why do white people…” or “Why are black people…” or “What about the people sleeping outside…?”

These questions generally spurn an instinctive, fast, hushed reaction of, “Oh, let’s talk about that once we get home.”

I don’t want to offend, after all.

My African friends generally think this is insane. Race and economic status are given points of reference in their society, where people are labeled, without insult or offense, as “white,” “brown,” “dark,” “light” and are often known by their professions—and therefore economic standing—before their names. “Where is The Carpenter?” “Have you seen The Professor?”

I guess it’s easier to talk about poverty and race when the differences are not as vast—when the majority of people are of a common race and economic status.

When one is at home.

The embarrassment of disclosure must come along when the disparities appear, coinciding with the literal embarrassment of riches.

Which may be another reason, along with those Siobhán mentioned last week, that philanthropists often prefer to give anonymously. And why it is perhaps so important, as she reminded us, that, “The public use of our money can say so much. Putting big money and names to our work can speak to what we share as women, what we want as women and the society we want to shape as women.”

Money talks, if given a voice. Money creates movements.

If in doubt, think Gates, the cause of AIDS in Africa and how his bandwagon is about as packed as an African bush taxi.

Seems an appropriate time to be thinking about AIDS in Africa anyway, as today we mark World AIDS Day, and have the opportunity to reflect on an illness that seems more and more to be a mark of the inequities of race, gender and yes, the “p” word than just a disease.

Philanthropic leaders salute Stepping Stones!

Philanthropic leaders gathered today at the Washington Regional Association of Grantmakers Annual Meeting had many different opinions and thoughts on issues of local and national poverty, but they all seemed to agree that The Women’s Foundation’s Stepping Stones program is to be lauded as an effective, innovative leader in transforming lives.

In a discussion on sustainable, meaningful efforts to address poverty, Ralph Smith, Senior Vice President of the Annie E. Casey Foundation, called Stepping Stones an "amazing effort" and stated, "Those supporting that effort should be congratulated, because you’re pointing the way."

Patricia McGuire, President of Trinity (Washington) University and one of The Washingtonian’s "100 Most Powerful Women of Washington," thanked The Women’s Foundation for its work on building the financial skills of area women, a primary component of Stepping Stones. She noted that the Stepping Stones approach is an important and effective one because it addresses poverty by moving from charity to investments that empower people to sustain change in their own lives.

To learn more about why Stepping Stones is viewed as a leading model in addressing poverty and empowering women and their families, check out the program’s latest report, Stepping Stones 2006: Paving Women’s Pathways to Economic Security. It explains how 5,500 women saved nearly $3 million while shedding more than $72,000 in personal debt, and more!

Giving Out Loud!

Marjorie forwarded an article entitled “Women’s Philanthropy Group Goes Public with Causes; Menlo-based Network Enters Political Fray With Ad” that got me thinking; what is the difference between the power of philanthropy and the power of openly, PUBLICLY, using money?

The Women Donors Network (WDN), profiled in the article, decided to find out with a first-time public endeavor, a voting rights campaign characterized as “a national coming-out party” for the 175 women members who give a total of $100 million dollars a year. A party indeed!

These women know that voting, like giving, is a demonstration of one’s values, both acts speak to who we are and provide us each with a powerful way to shape the society we live in. They also know that both are often private acts. What makes this first-time foray for the WDN so striking is the collective decision of these women to publicly demonstrate the power of money. They are moving beyond a power of philanthropy, even the power of the purse and choosing to do it publicly, even OUT LOUD. Why?

We know the power of philanthropy; The Women’s Foundation has 101 stories of donors, grantee partners and clients whose lives have changed because of philanthropy.

We know the power of giving together; The Women’s Foundation is, in itself, a testimony to the difference giving together makes.

But the power of openly, publicly, using money?

How do we all talk about that?!

Philanthropy can be private and powerful. But what about philanthropy that is public and powerful? What do we, as women donors of all shapes, sizes and incomes, understand the difference to be? As individuals, the desire, indeed the need, to be anonymous can make sense. Going public is scary, uncomfortable, even threatening. But together, as a collective, as a shared voice, the public use of our money can say so much. Putting big money and names to our work can speak to what we share as women, what we want as women and the society we want to shape as women.

It is new territory, this public and powerful use of money, that is for sure, but like the frontiers of any new terrain, essential to exploring together.

First Week, First Blog

In the “can-do-right-now” spirit of the Women’s Foundation, I offer my first blog in my first week as Director of Communications and Philanthropic Programs!

I am Siobhán O’Riordan and I am delighted to both be joining the Foundation and bringing all my communications and programmatic expertise from eight years in Boston-area philanthropies. My work in philanthropy is fueled by the thrill of connecting; nothing brings me greater satisfaction than bringing people and ideas together on a path of discovery and learning. There are many ways to navigate the worlds in which we all live and pass between, yet the paths most traveled are ones of friendship, community and hope.

I believe that philanthropy – both the act of giving and receiving for the greater good – provides just the right place for meaningful connection, real community building and the rooting and growing of hope that together, we can make the difference. I look forward to meeting and learning from you all! Feel free to say hello at soriordan@wawf.org.

Oprah Forces Philanthropy

Oprah’s latest gift to her ever enraptured audience was a feeling, not a Ferrari. She has challenged 300 people to accept $1,000 with the condition that they give it away. Since the show’s airing there has been much commentary and speculation on the popularity of this forced philanthropy, especially how it ranks amongst her previous benevolence.

I think it is brilliant. The only giving medium more powerful than philanthropy itself is teaching others how to get engaged. Thank you Oprah, for providing 300 people, who may or may not have been previously charitable, with the first step of getting the giving feeling.

THEARC for Everybody

Yesterday, I had my second visit to the THEARC (The Town Hall Education Arts & Recreation Campus), which is the new home of the Washington Middle School for Girls (WMSG) one of our Grantee Partners.

Anne Mosle, our fearless leader, and Barb Strom Thompson, who Co-Chairs the Rainmakers’ Giving Circle, also participated in the visit to meet with some of the WMSG students. Visiting with the WMSG students was pure pleasure. They are bright, articulate, engaged, and very honest. Most of them come from difficult family circumstances, but you would never know it by their spirit for learning and the goals that they have set for themselves. Yet, when looking at the neighbor that surrounds THEARC, you’re reminded that the girls are very much “at-risk.”

During the visit, a group of girls treated us to an a cappella rendition of their current favorite song they called “I Don’t Want to be a Murderer.” The passion with which the girls sang the song was the same passion that any young girl in any part of our region would sing a popular song. But, why where they singing a song about murder? Well to my surprise, the name of the song really is Unfaithful and it is a song about a conflicted young woman. I’m still not thrilled about the song’s message, however I am so glad that that WMSG allows the young girls to sing ‘their’ songs with passion while providing a creative learning space.

I wish that I had time to visit WMSG and THEARC everyday. It is a perfect reflection of what happens when vision, philanthropy, and political will sync up. I’m looking forward to THEARC 2.0 emerge in our region.

Let’s pop women’s philanthropy…..

There’s a growing movement of women who have given a million dollars to help women and girls. And hey, with women starting business and graduating from colleges and universities at record levels, isn’t it time? One of our own, Julie Jensen, will be honored next week at the National Capitol Philanthropy Day for her giving way above and beyond any call of duty—and for her passion for investing in women and youth. Julie is leading a new generation of women philanthropists.

For years, she has quietly and consistently helped to build key community institutions like the Latin American Youth Center. She gives her time, money, brains and heart.img_5516.jpg In the picture from left to right is Marjorie Sims, Stacey D. Stewart, Anne Mosle, Julie Jensen and Ruth Goins. She answered our call to serve as an Honorary Chair of Stepping Stones, our initiative designed to build the financial independence of low-income women who are heading families in our community. She stepped up with a leadership gift of a million dollars and has spoken across the country with other women donors, non-profit leaders and women clients. Julie, a widow, knows how hard it is to raise two sons alone—even when you have resources. She is one of the many women saying “I care. I want to give and get involved.”

Read more about her next Friday when she receives her award. In the meantime, I want to do my bit to pop women’s philanthropy. As you know, we have a challenge gift in play – with less than $10,000 to raise to meet our goal of $50,000. I will match any pledges made via this blog up to $1,000. Just let me know who you are and why you care! Pop!

60% to the $50,000 challenge

Friends, I am pleased to say that one week after the Leadership Luncheon we are rapidly approaching utilizing the full $50,000 match provided by our angel, Charlotte Perret. Thank you to those who have given – gifts have ranged from $10 to $5,000. board_laurie_emrich.jpgSpecial kudos to Women’s Foundation Board member Laurie Emrich, who has added another match to those contributions made by people who were her guests at the event.

WE LOVE OUR BOARD’S COMMITMENT!

We’ve got 13 days to get to the full $50,000. Let’s do it! Give Now.

What Muhammad Yunus knows and we aim to prove in the Washington Area

Today the world heard that Yunus (as he is known in the international development world) has been honored with the Nobel prize. What Muhammad Yunus knows, and what has been the backbone of the work of Grameen and all of its emulators, is that it’s the WOMEN who start their businesses, pay back their loans at nearly flawless rates, and go on to improve not just their own lives…but those of many in their communities. Washington Area Women’s Foundation congratulates Yunus, and all the women who have taken advantage of Grameen’s programs.

Don’t forget about our $50K Leadership Challenge matching grant (We ARE NEARLY HALFWAY THERE!). Every dollar you give today has twice as much impact. Help us continue to demonstrate – here in our nation’s capital – that as a community we “get” what Yunus and others have known for years – that “when women thrive, everyone thrives.” Give now.