Call for presenters: 2009 Stepping Stones Research Briefing!

The fourth annual Washington Area Women’s Foundation Stepping Stones Research Briefing will be held the morning of Wednesday, May 20, 2009 at The Urban Institute in Washington, D.C.

The Women’s Foundation and The Urban Institute co-sponsor the annual research briefing.  This year’s will highlight research on issues relevant to low-income, women-headed families.

Stepping Stones is The Women’s Foundation’s multi-year initiative focused on increasing economic security and financial independence for low-income, women-headed families in the Washington metropolitan area. The Stepping Stones Research Briefing provides an opportunity for The Women’s Foundation and its partners to learn about the latest research that can inform their work supporting this population.

The first three research briefings each drew audiences of over 100, including representatives from community-based organizations, funders, government agencies, and research institutions.

Persons interested in participating in this year’s research briefing should submit an abstract of their research and findings (no more than 1,000 words) to Peter Tatian at The Urban Institute by 5:00 pm on Friday, March 13, 2009.  Abstracts should make clear how the research is relevant to issues facing low-income, women-headed families and those who are working to assist these women.

We are particularly interested in abstracts related to how best to protect women’s economic security in a recession, including submissions on:
• Changing Demographic and Economic Conditions for Women
• Increasing Income, Building and Preserving Assets
• Workforce Development and Emerging Employment Sectors
• Job Retention and Work Supports (including public benefits)
• Early Care and Education
• Health and Safety

Final selection of presenters will be made by March 31, 2009.

Copies of all presentations, as well as audio recordings of the entire event, will be posted on The Urban Institute’s Web site after the event.  Presentations from last year’s research briefing can be found here.  More information on the 2007 and 2008 research briefings is available at The Women’s Foundation.org.

Questions about the research briefing should be addressed to Peter Tatian or Gwen Rubinstein at The Women’s Foundation.

Please share this announcement with anyone who may be interested.

Stepping Stones Research Update: December 2008

As part of our ongoing commitment–in partnership with The Urban Institute–to providing information and resources related to the goals of Stepping Stones, please find below a summary of recent research on issues of economic security and financial independence for women and their families.

This research is summarized and compiled for The Women’s Foundation by Liza Getsinger of The Urban Institute, NeighborhoodInfo DC.

Financial Education and Wealth Creation News

The Urban Institute looks at how the financial crisis is affecting retirement savings.  (Fact sheet) (Related text)

DC Fiscal Policy institute looks at why so many families in the city aren’t able to make ends meet, and offers policy recommendations on how to bridge the gap between earnings and basic expenses.  (Abstract) (Full text)

Jobs and Business Ownership News

The Urban Insitute looks at how scheduling and paid time off impact workers in low-skill jobs.  (Abstract) (Full text)

Child Care and Early Education News

The Urban Insitute reviews research literature on the impact of performance-based accountability on school and teacher behavior.  (Intro) (Full text)

Health and Safety News

ChildTrends explores what kids have available to them to eat at school, and what they’re really eating.  (Key findings) (Full text)

Other News and Research

The Brookings Insitution looks at how a new poverty measure would provide a more accurate picture of economic need in the United States. (Abstract) (Full text)

Stepping Stones Research Update: November 2008

As part of our ongoing commitment–in partnership with The Urban Institute–to providing information and resources related to the goals of Stepping Stones, please find below a summary of recent research on issues of economic security and financial independence for women and their families.

This research is summarized and compiled for The Women’s Foundation by Liza Getsinger of The Urban Institute, NeighborhoodInfo DC.

Financial Education and Wealth Creation News

The Urban Institute explores whether low wage workers are are destined for low income at retirement.  (Abstract) (Full text)

Jobs and Business Ownership News

Harry Holzer asks whether living wage laws do (and can) matter. (Abstract) (Full text)

Child Care and Early Education News

The National Center for Children and Poverty finds that chronic absences as early as kindergarten have a significant impact on educational performance in first grade. (Abstract) (Full text)

DC could be a more family-friendly city through investments in education, affordable housing and revitalizing neighborhoods. (Abstract) (Full text)

Health and Safety News

The Kaiser Family Foundation releases new fact sheet on women’s insurance coverage.

Other News and Research

A nationational investment in children before they enter public schools would pay off. (Abstract) (Full text)

How a bank account can help a woman escape domestic violence.

CBS Evening News aired a story last week about a mother of three in Washington state who is rebuilding her life after leaving a domestic violence situation.

One of the tools that helped her is an IDA (Individual Development Account) matched savings account, which she used to buy a car, a computer and a home. The three-minute video is on Capital Area Asset Builder’s Web site.

This same tool is available through CAAB for low-income women to help improve their financial situation.  They can earn up to $3,000 to use towards buying a car or a home, starting a small business, paying off medical debt, or continuing education or job training classes.

Christine Walker, a client of CAAB and Lydia’s House–both Grantee Partners of The Women’s Foundation–used an IDA to help pay for school.  You can read her story here.

Emily Appel is the Matched Savings Program Director at Capital Area Asset Builders, a Grantee Partner of The Women’s Foundation, which supports CAAB’s IDA program through Stepping Stones.

The Women's Foundation releases first RFP on early care and education!

On October 15, 2008, The Women’s Foundation held a Community Briefing on the importance of early care and education. 

Craig Pascal, Senior Vice President/Territory Manager, Community Development Bank at PNC and Tobi Printz-Platnick, Program Officer, Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz Foundation, made a strong case for increased investments in early care and education.

The expert panelists presented compelling research and echoed the importance of increased investments.

Our parent advocate shared from her personal experiences the challenges she confronts on a daily basis of accessing quality care for her son with disabilities.

As we learned at the Community Briefing, strategic funds invested in strong organizations can significantly improve the quality of, and expansion of increased access to, developmentally appropriate care for children from birth through five years old.

"During this economic downturn, it is critically important to invest in a proven strategy to support our future workforce.  Investments in young children are sound investments," stated Craig Pascal, Senior Vice President/Territory Manager, Community Development Banking, PNC Bank. "There is no better time than now to invest in the future success of young children to ensure they are prepared for schools and life."

To help foster increased access to and quality of early care and education in our region, The Women’s Foundation has released a Request for Proposals for Access and Quality Grants, seeking to invest in organizations committed to implementing effective strategies that can promote, ensure and sustain opportunities to expand access and improve the quality of services for low-income families and their young children by promoting systems reform.  Such strategies include promoting systems reform, implementing changes in early care and education practices, and investing in public education efforts to increase the public will for early care and education.

Proposals under this RFP are due at 5 p.m. on Friday, November 21, 2008. For more information about this funding opportunity, please review the RFP guidelines.

HyeSook Chung is The Women’s Foundation’s program officer for early care and education.

New Stepping Stones RFP released for Phase 2!

We at The Women’s Foundation are very excited to announce the release today of a new Request for Proposals under our Stepping Stones Initiative.

We have learned so much during Phase 1 of Stepping Stones (2005-2008) through our Grantee Partners, their clients, other stakeholders and our evaluators.

We hope Phase 2 (2009-2012) will deepen this work, as well as the learning, and build on the initiative’s success in increasing the economic security and financial independence of low-income, women-headed families in our region.

One of the greatest learnings from Phase 1 is the value of partnership and collaboration. That’s part of why Phase 2 and this RFP are so exciting: they seek to strengthen this learning.

Phase 2 is also exciting for us as funders because we are using it as an opportunity to broaden the frame of “place-based” philanthropy, which now concentrates giving in a particular geographic place, usually a neighborhood. Our approach will intentionally focuses instead on supporting organizations and collaborative efforts that reach low-income women where they work, attend school, engage or participate in professional or personal development services, or receive services for their children – not only where they live.

So welcome to the beginning of Phase 2 – we can’t wait to see what it brings!

Gwen Rubinstein is a program officer at The Women’s Foundation overseeing Stepping Stones’ grantmaking in the areas of jobs, early care and education, and strategic opportunity and partnerships.

See where we're investing more than half a million dollars!

The Women’s Foundation is proud to announce that the board of directors has recently approved grants totaling $645,500 to be invested in the Washington metropolitan area.  This brings our 2008 grantmaking total to more than $1.1 million.

See where and how we’re investing.

Our grants are made with gifts from people throughout our community who—through The Power of Giving Together—make their charitable investments go further by pooling their dollars to make grants that have a significant impact on local nonprofits that are changing the lives of women and girls.

At The Women’s Foundation, we give more, by giving together.

Join in The Power of Giving Together!

Navigating egalitarian values and wealth led to pathway of philanthropy and justice.

Philanthropist Laurie Emrich, a "woman moving millions," and a founding board member and supporter of The Women’s Foundation, as well as many international women’s funds, describes how her journey from Denver to Africa to Washington, D.C. was an intellectual, spiritual and emotional one leading to her commitment to give back to her community and to "participate in the long-term building of an inclusive, community-based, multi-racial movement for justice."

Read more about Laurie’s journey to social justice and philanthropy in her own words here.

Laurie explains in her piece that she derives inspiration from the words of 1960s rhythm and blues singer-songwriter Wilson Pickett: "Ya gotta shake whatcha brought whicha."

Laurie’s story is one of transforming the gifts and abundance she has received into a true spirit and lifetime of giving back. 

She inspires us all to consider what we all "brought whicha," and how we can use it–whatever our gifts–to better our communities and the world.

Stepping Stones Research Update: May 2008

As part of our ongoing commitment–in partnership with The Urban Institute–to providing information and resources related to the goals of Stepping Stones, please find below summary of recent research on issues of economic security and financial independence for women and their families.

This research is summarized and compiled for The Women’s Foundation by Liza Getsinger of The Urban Institute, NeighborhoodInfo DC.

Financial Education and Wealth Creation News

The Cost of Maintaining Ownership in the Current Crisis: Comparisons in Twenty Cities
By Dean Baker, Danilo Pelletiere and Hye Jin Rho
Center for Economic and Policy Research
April 2008

The collapse of the bubble in the U.S. housing market is creating chaos in financial markets, while throwing the economy into a recession. It is also threatening millions of homeowners and renters with the loss of their homes. This paper compares ownership and rental costs in twenty major metropolitan areas.

Key Findings:

  • In many markets, homeownership costs are in line with rental costs. In these areas, it is practical and desirable to focus on policies that keep homeowners in their homes.
  • Prices are now falling rapidly in many of these markets; homeowners are unlikely to accumulate equity. In fact, it is likely that many homeowners will end up selling their homes for less than their outstanding mortgage, even if new mortgages are issued with substantial write-downs from the original mortgage.
  • In bubble-inflated markets, homeownership is not only a costly and risky proposition, but continuing price declines mean that homeowners will not accrue any equity.
  • A policy of ensuring suitable rental options is likely to be more helpful to many current homeowners. This policy can encourage the rapid conversion of vacant and abandoned units to rental properties, as well as policies that facilitate the conversion of ownership units to rental units for the same households.
  • Many of the properties facing foreclosure are already rental properties. In these cases, foreclosures often result in the displacement of the current tenants. Congress should recognize this problem and consider policies that provide greater security to tenants in such situations.

Abstract, introduction and key findings
Full text

Jobs and Business Ownership News

Hometown Prosperity: Increasing Opportunity for DC’s Low-Income Working Families
DC Appleseed and DC Fiscal Policy Institute
January 2008 (Released April 14, 2008)

This report describes working poor families with children in the District and the barriers they face to economic advancement, and lays out essential policy changes that could improve their situation.

Key findings and Policy Recommendations:

  • Nearly one in three working families in the District was poor in 2005.
  • In fact, a higher proportion of working families in the District is poor compared to the proportion of working families in neighboring states or in the nation as a whole.
  • Enhance access to community college educational offerings for its residents by encouraging and developing regional partnerships and/or investing in the creation of a local community college as a branch of or separate from the University of DC.
  • Make a priority of raising wages in women-dominated sectors and moving women into non-traditional careers.
  • Set wage and benefit standards for all economic development programs.
  • Implement paid sick leave for all District workers and consider developing a paid disability/family leave program.
  • Continue to address the affordable housing crisis in the city, and promote housing for low-income families that takes into account access to transportation, jobs, and educational resources.

Abstract, introduction and key findings
Full text

Human Capital and Women’s Business Ownership
By Darrene Hackler, Ellen Harpel, and Heike Mayer
Small Business Administration- Office of Advocacy
April 2008

This article begins to shed light on the relationship between different elements of human capital and self-employment among women.

Key Findings:

  • The study finds that self-employed women have more education and increased their educational attainment at a faster rate compared to other working women.
  • The percentage of self-employed women in managerial occupations consistently exceeded the rate for other working women, and self-employed women participated in different industries than other working women.
  • More self-employed men hold an advanced degree compared to self-employed women over the study period, but the gap narrowed considerably by 2006.
  • Self-employed minorities were slightly more likely than self-employed whites to have a college degree throughout much of the study period.
  • Earnings data show that the self-employed were most likely to be either in the first (lowest) or fourth (highest) quartile.
  • A lower percentage of self-employed women hold managerial occupations than do self-employed men, and there are lower rates of self-employment in industries where there is less overall female participation (such as communications, transportation, wholesale trade, manufacturing, and construction).

Abstract, introduction and key findings
Full text

Child Care and Early Education News

Planning for Quality Schools: Meeting the Needs of District Families
By David F. Garrison, Marni D. Allen, Margery Austin Turner, Jennifer Comey, Barika X. Williams, Elizabeth Guernsey, Mary Filardo, Nancy Huvendick, and Ping Sung
Brookings Institution, The Urban Institute, and 21st Century School Fund
April 24, 2008

This report is the first phase of a three-part project to help the District of Columbia create a firm analytical basis for planning for quality schools to meet the needs of the city’s families.

Key Findings:

  • The District’s population has increased since 2000; the total number of school-age children has declined slightly. Conditions in both the housing market and the public school system contribute to this trend.
  • The District’s population is becoming increasingly diverse, with rising numbers of whites and Hispanics and a declining share of blacks. Still, the District remains highly segregated along both racial and income lines. The populations of Wards 7 and 8 are over 90 percent black, while nearly all of the city’s white residents live in Wards 2 and 3. And in 2006, median household income for the city’s white residents was $92,000, almost three times as high as the $34,000 median household income of the city’s blacks.
  • Almost half of all white public school students live in Ward 3, and almost none live East of the River. In contrast, more than half of all black public school students live East of the River, while Hispanic students are heavily concentrated in Wards 1 and 4.
  • There are 234 public schools and distinct public school programs in the District serving pre-school students through adults without high school diplomas, a significant expansion of supply since 1997.
  • In 2006-07, 72, 378 students were enrolled in DCPS and public charter schools, close to the same number as the previous year, but substantially lower than a decade earlier. Since 1997-98, the number of students attending DCPS schools has dropped by almost one-third, while public charter enrollment has grown by over 400 percent.
  • In 2006-07, there were 10,857 public special education students in the District, just over 15 percent of all public school students. This is on the high end compared to other high-poverty urban school districts. Special education students, like the general student population, are concentrated East of the River, and a disproportionate share of black public school students are classified as special education students (compared to white and Hispanic public school students).

Abstract, introduction and key findings
Full text

The Impact of the Mortgage Crisis on Children and Their Education
By Julia B. Isaacs and Phillip Lovell
Brookings Institution
April 2008

By examining past research, this article examines the potential impacts of these foreclosures on children are their education, behavior and health.

Key Findings:

  • Research shows that children who experience excessive mobility, such as those impacted by the mortgage crisis, will suffer in school.
  • The National Assessment of Educational Progress (known as the Nation’s Report Card) has found that students with two or more school changes in the previous year are half as likely to be proficient in reading as their stable peers.
  • One study found that frequent movers were 77 percent more likely than children who have not moved to have four or more behavior problems.
  • One study found that working families spending more than half of their income on housing have less money available than other families to spend on such crucial items as health care and health insurance
  • The mortgage crisis is more than a blow to our economy. It is crippling our children, their education, and as a result, the nation’s future. And while our government is working to alleviate the financial damage caused by this calamity, the impact on the nation’s children is going unnoticed. As economists focus on solving the problem, policy-makers must make an effort to mitigate the damage of this disaster on our young people.

Abstract, introduction and key findings
Full text 

Health and Safety News

Medicaid, SCHIP and Economic Downturn: Policy Challenges and Policy Responses
Kaiser Family Foundation
April, 28 2008

Examines the implications of a downturn for health coverage and state programs and projects the impact of one percentage point rise in the national unemployment rate on Medicaid and SCHIP and the number of uninsured individuals.

Key Findings:

  • Economic Downturns Increase Medicaid Enrollment and Spending – This analysis shows that a 1 percentage point rise in the national unemployment rate would increase Medicaid and SCHIP enrollment by 1 million (600,000 children and 400,000 non-elderly adults) and cause the number of uninsured to grow by 1.1 million.
  • Economic Downturns Reduce State Revenues – Medicaid and SCHIP are also affected by state revenue declines. Recent Urban Institute research shows that a 1 percentage point increase in the unemployment rate causes state General Fund revenue to drop by 3 to 4 percent below expected levels. 
  • State Policy Responses Can Worsen Cyclical Downturns – Unlike the federal government, almost all states are legally required to balance their budgets. To meet this requirement in times of economic stress, states may take such steps as tapping reserves, borrowing from trust funds, securitizing future revenue streams, delaying spending from one fiscal year to the next, etc.
  • Congress May Consider Options to Better Target Federal Relief – As states enter a new economic downturn, policymakers could consider three basic options for fiscal relief. One approach would, like JGTRRA, provide a uniform increase in Medicaid matching rates to all states, for a specified time. 
  • Federal Fiscal Relief Can Prevent Medicaid Cuts During Economic Downturns – As a new economic downturn unfolds, many states appear headed for serious budget shortfalls. The federal government does not have balanced budget requirements, so it has the flexibility to target supplemental funds to states during an economic downturn, preventing harmful and ill-timed cuts in health coverage.

Abstract, introduction and key findings
Full text

Other News and Research

Women in the Wake of the Storm: Examining the Post-Katrina Realities of the Women of New Orleans and the Gulf Coast
By Dr. Avis Jones-DeWeever
Institute for Women’s Policy Research
April 2008

This report tells the stories of women post-Katrina and, in so doing, provides an analysis of women’s increased vulnerability during times of disaster, and discusses how the experiences of women affected by Katrina align with the experiences of women around the world who have experienced other large-scale crises. It also provides a race/class/gendered analysis of women’s post-Katrina experiences, with a special emphasis on what they are doing now to rebuild their lives, reconstruct their homes, restore their families, and reclaim their communities.  It tells the story of Katrina from the eyes of the women who lived through it.

Key findings:

  • Most of those with whom the author spoke with seemed relieved that other people wanted to know what they had been through, how they had survived, and what they were doing now to keep on keeping on. Nearly every woman bemoaned the fact that their voices had not been heard and as a result, their stories have been left untold.
  • In conversations with women in and around New Orleans, three primary issues remained at the forefront of their concerns: housing, healthcare, and economic well-being. Each of these issues had multiple and often interlocking reverberations on their lives. All of those with whom we spoke expressed a deep commitment to their communities and desire to face any remaining challenges; however, our contacts’ health, sense of security, and for some even that small but persistent kernel of sustaining hope all have been jeopardized by the slow pace of recovery and the prolonged lack of normalcy.

Policy Recommendations:

  • Make affordable housing a top priority. The safety of women and girls remain in jeopardy with each day that severe housing shortages go unaddressed.
  • Incorporate women in the rebuilding economy through non-traditional training and enforcement of anti-discrimination laws. Women by and large have been shut out of the most lucrative aspects of the rebuilding economy and have suffered as a result.
  • Increase the availability and quality of child care and schools. As the population of the region continues to expand, so does the need for child care and educational institutions.
  • Address both physical and mental health care needs, especially among the most needy. Health care post-Katrina, for many, has become yet another disaster.

Full text

Downward trend in funding for women and minorities should raise red flags.

Getting the Ball Rolling
Thirty years ago, Women & Philanthropy was born out of the desire and outrage of a small cadre of women (and a couple of male allies).  Troubled by the lack of representation of women in positions of leadership in the philanthropic field (a report from the Council on Foundations reported that only 18 percent of foundation trustees and 28 percent of foundation professional staff were women), and the dearth of program funding supporting programs for women, one motivated woman held an impromptu lunch to figure out what could be done.

The lunch was standing room only!

In 1977, when the organization was founded, funding to women and girls was a scant 0.5 percent.  Yes, you are reading that correctly: half of a percent of total foundation giving!

Can you imaging half of a percent for 52 percent of the population!

The new organization set out to address the lack of female representation in the sector, the appalling lack of funding, and the general education of, and communication with, foundations about issues and problems affecting women.

Eight years later (in 1985), the Women’s Funding Network (WFN) was formed as an umbrella organization, bringing together the various women’s funds fueling the burgeoning "women’s funding movement," which was really gaining momentum.

Its mission: "to ensure that women’s funds are recognized as the ‘investment of choice’ for people who value the full participation of women and girls as key to strong, equitable, and sustainable communities and societies."

Women’s funds had been in existence for many years.  The majority of the funds at the time were rooted in the women’s and civil rights movements in the 70s; however, there were a small number with histories stretching back to the late 1800s and early 1900s!

These funds were the result of women’s recognition and desire to be in greater command of financial resources, and in turn to be able to use these resources to support work that served and transformed the lives of women and girls.

In 1985, there were roughly 35 women’s funds in some stage of their development.

While Women & Philanthropy and the Women’s Funding Network employed very different strategic approaches, both organizations worked tirelessly over the subsequent years toward the same ultimate goal: to increase resources to women and girls.

Where are we now?
I think that clearly both groups can claim success on many levels.

Within the field of philanthropy, women now comprise more than 74 percent of program officers, 54 percent of CEOs and 35 percent of trustees.

Today, the Women’s Funding Network celebrates over 125 women’s funds worldwide!  And, collectively, women’s and girls funds have raised over $400 million!

Surely with such achievements under our belts in the women’s funding movement, we can claim victory!

Can’t we?

While it is true that there are many people and institutions that deserve a great deal of appreciation and recognition for the tremendous work they have done in securing resources for women and girls, the unfortunate reality is that we still have miles to go before we’re done.

Show Us the Money!
In the Foundation Center’s 2008 Foundation Giving Trends publication, released last month, the Foundation Center actually reports a decline in giving to women and girls – from 6.4 in 2005 to 5.7 in 2006. 

Yes, it can be said that the movement from the 0.5 percent of 1977 to where we are today mark steps in the right direction, but even at its peak of 7.3 percent (in 2003), I think that we can all agree that the funding levels remain woefully inadequate! 

Further, this downward trend specifically should raise pink–if not red–flags for all of us.

But this is not just a gender issue – the Giving Trends document also notes a decline in funding to “ethnic or racial minorities” as a whole from 8.2 percent in 2005 to 7.4 percent in 2006, with a decline seen for most groups with the exception of Native Americans/American Indians, where there was a 0.2 percent increase.

In Search of Answers
So what is going on?  How is it that we can have more and more women in the sector, and more women in control of directing large financial resources, yet not only have we not reached a level of parity in our funding, but we are actually seeing a decline in this support?

Are our data collection methods flawed?

Perhaps.  Even the best data collection has some margin of error.

The data reported in the 2008 Giving Trends document explores national trends from 2006/2005 – the limitations of data collection mean that there will always be a lag time between data collection, analysis and reporting.  Also, The Foundation Center uses a sampling base which includes grants of $10,000 or more from the largest 1000-ish foundations in the U.S. that report to them, so there is definitely room, for missed funding dollars considering the size of many foundations, including most women’s funds, and the size of many of the grants given to women and girls.

Nevertheless, these numbers are the best we have to-date and they are consistently collected, so while there may ultimately be some funding that may be slipping through the cracks, it is unlikely to drastically change this picture, or the prevailing trends.

Further, it raises concerns about the average size of grants to women and girls, and the scale at which most women’s funds operate compared to the more “mainstream/traditional” foundations.

Maybe grantmakers and donors are investing more in “universal funding,” and not specifically targeting women and girls.

This is also a possibility.

There has long been a debate about the value of “mainstreaming” gender on many levels, including grantmaking.
Unfortunately, increasing evidence has shown that these “generic” or “universal” funding dollars do not ”trickle down” to meet the needs of women and girls.

Are foundations just “over it”?

A continued roadblock for funding to women and girls is the “special interest” stigma.  It becomes a double edged sword.  By segmenting funding and programs for women and girls for particular attention, we may be reinforcing this concept of women and girls as a “special interest,” and therefore optional group, rather than the integral parts of society we are.

We also know that some of society’s most chronic problems – poverty, health care, violence – hit women the hardest. One need only look to our Stepping Stones program to see this in our own region. 

Moreover, as Kofi Annan so eloquently reminds us:  "When women are fully involved, the benefits can be seen immediately; families are healthier; they are better fed; their income, savings and reinvestment go up. And what is true of families is true of communities, and eventually, of whole countries."

So what does this declining investment in women and girls say about our commitment to our communities?

The real answer m
ay lie somewhere in and around all of these hypotheses. Though we may not be able to connect all of the dots to get us from A to Z, what is clear is that these numbers continue to reinforce the significance of the work that we, and other women’s funds, are doing. And support the ongoing argument for a continued and, in fact, increased investment in women and girls, and the continuation of a dialogue around gender.

We have made progress, and we must celebrate those milestones.

However, we can not rest on our laurels.

There is still a long way to go, and those achievements that we have already made must be protected so we don’t lose the precious ground we have gained.

But the next time someone tells you that we don’t need to be talking about women and girls anymore because we’ve “been there, done that,” I hope you remember my little blog, and can set the record straight.

It is in all of our best interests to ensure the continued investment in women and girls.

Let’s keep that needle moving!