The Stress of Shopping for the Food Stamp Challenge

NG ShoppingThis week, several members of The Women’s Foundation staff are participating in the Food Stamp Challenge, an exercise organized by D.C. Hunger Solutions that educates the public and raises awareness of the benefits of food stamps and the challenges recipients face while eating on a very limited budget. The staff will be sharing their experiences on this blog.

Yesterday, I took my 12-year-old son with me to my local Safeway to do my shopping for the Food Stamp Challenge.  I had $30 to buy food for an entire week for myself.  Just the process of shopping was highly enlightening and also frustrating.  First thing I realized was how much I take for granted when I am shopping for food in a typical week.  Yes – I always shop from a list, carefully crafted to enable me to prepare meals for my family over the course of the week.  But once the list is made, with only rare exceptions, I don’t really look at the prices of the things I am buying – they are on the list, they are part of the meal plan, so they go in the cart.  That is probably the surest sign of economic security and stability – and the anti-thesis of my shopping experience yesterday.

With only $30, the first thing I realized was I needed to get the maximum amount of food with the money I had.  That meant 1) fewer fresh fruits and vegetables; 2) fewer proteins – I purchased eggs, a five-pack of chicken legs, a can of black beans, a can of garbanzo beans, and peanut butter as my protein quotient; 3) more carbs – bread, pasta, rice; 4) organic was out the window, as were any consideration of sodium, carbs, fat, or nutritional content – it was all about cost.

The second thing I realized was how stressful it was to walk up to the checkout line knowing I had only $30 to spend and no more.  People were lining up behind me, and wondering why I was keeping some items in the cart as I waited to see what the tally would be.  When it came in lower than I expected, I added the items held back.  When all was said and done, I had $2.45 left – there was no way I was leaving that on the table.  So I completed check-out, left the groceries with my son, and went back in to find one or two more items for my $2.45.

The third thing I realized was that I could not afford the luxury of things like chocolate and caffeine.

This is going to be an interesting week.

Nicky Goren is president of Washington Area Women’s Foundation.

Food Stamp Challenge: Day Three – Waste Not…

grocery storeThis week, several members of The Women’s Foundation staff are participating in the Food Stamp Challenge, an exercise organized by D.C. Hunger Solutions that educates the public and raises awareness of the benefits of food stamps and the challenges recipients face while eating on a very limited budget. The staff will be sharing their experiences on this blog.

Entering day three of the Food Stamp (SNAP) Challenge, and I find myself acutely aware of two things: food and waste.

It has become clear to me that in general I buy more food than needed for my family; I cook more food than we eat; and we eat more food than we really need to. Why? Because I have the luxury to do so. On any given day, I can walk into Whole Foods (one of the most expensive organic grocery stores in the area) and without even thinking twice, I can buy whatever food items I want for my family. The result is that I often over-buy. The plums look particularly good that day, so I buy some. Were they on my list? No. Did we need them? No. Could we have done with the bunch of bananas and a few apples? Yes.

And every week before I go grocery shopping for the next week, I always check my refrigerator. Most weeks, I’m throwing something away—leftovers that sit untouched or fruit or vegetables that haven’t been eaten. Either way it’s wasteful, and I cringe to think about the amount of food that is wasted in our house on a weekly basis. Why? Because we have the luxury to do so.

On Tuesday, the Washington Post ran a story about how Montgomery County plans to redistribute unused food to those in need. According to the article, “Supermarkets, restaurants and other nonresidential establishments in Montgomery County throw away 96 million pounds of food a year.” Imagine—96 million pounds of food a year, and that’s just in Montgomery County! The planned food recycling program is modeled after the Food Recovery Network, a student group at the University of Maryland that collects unused food from the university and donates it to food banks and homeless shelters. To date, they’ve recovered and donated over 30,000 meals.

So as I sat at the dinner table last night watching my nine-year-old daughter pick the crust off her bread because she “doesn’t like the crust,” I was again acutely aware of food and waste and the stark differences in the realities of our region’s families. While my daughter was picking the crust off her bread, there were thousands of kids who were hungry and would have given anything to have her grilled cheese and tomato sandwich, crust and all.

Jennifer Lockwood-Shabat is vice president of Washington Area Women’s Foundation.

Food Stamp Challenge: Day Three – For Some, the Challenge Doesn't End

This week, several members of The Women’s Foundation staff are participating in the Food Stamp Challenge, an exercise organized by D.C. Hunger Solutions that educates the public and raises awareness of the benefits of food stamps and the challenges recipients face while eating on a very limited budget. The staff will be sharing their experiences on this blog.

I am midway through the Food Stamp Challenge—eat for a week for $30 per person, the average amount a person receives in food stamps in DC. I am fortunate that one son and my husband agreed to do it with me.  This meant I could afford to buy a pound each of kidney beans (for chili), black beans (for tacos) and split peas (for soup), as well as packages of rice, white flour (biscuits, muffins) and cornmeal (corn bread with chili—yum!), allowing for greater variety in our meals than is possible for my colleague who is “going it alone.” And I’m fortunate that my son is vegetarian and my husband and I often cook without meat, so I could leave meat out of the budget without missing it. And it really helps that during the first couple decades of our marriage we skated very close to the edge of poverty, so I know a few tricks about stretching a food budget—including actually enjoying leftovers!

All that said, I’m very conscious that we are playing a game this week.  We question the rules: Does gum count? Do kids’ week-time lunches count? Why can’t I eat cookies my colleague brought to the staff meeting? We cheat—one colleague with a glass of wine, me with a daily teabag provided at work. We complain about fairness: Why should I let that onion I bought last week go bad instead of putting it in my soup pot?  But mostly, we know there’s an end: After seven days we can go back to “normal.” We can eat fresh vegetables and fruit every day—even twice a day if we’re so inclined. We can choose the low-sodium organic tomato sauce if that’s our preference.  We can go out to lunch with colleagues. The “game” is over.

Not so for tens of thousands in our area—not just for those on food stamps, but also for the working poor. For them, this “challenge” is life. The rules are immutable. There’s no cheating. When the budget’s been spent, there’s no stocked pantry to fall back on; there’s no “My son had a football game and had to have high-quality protein to do his best;” there’s no luxury of ordering pizza when you come home too tired to cook.

Challenge, indeed.

Donna Wiedeman is the executive assistant to the president at The Women’s Foundation.

Why I'm Taking the Food Stamp Challenge

NG ShoppingThis week, several members of The Women’s Foundation staff are participating in the Food Stamp Challenge, an exercise organized by D.C. Hunger Solutions that educates the public and raises awareness of the benefits of food stamps and the challenges recipients face while eating on a very limited budget. The staff will be sharing their experiences on this blog.

As I prepare to take part in DC Hunger Solutions’ Food Stamps Challenge, I have some apprehension about what lies ahead.  With $30 to buy all my food and drinks for a week, I know that 1) I need to be really strategic about how I spend that money; 2) I am preparing myself to skip meals and feel hungry; and 3) I only have to do it for a week.  Except for that last one, these are all things that families who rely on food stamps have to deal with – in addition to all the other challenges they face – day in, day out, week after week, month after month.

Why am I doing this?  I have met so many women in our region who are struggling to get by, who rely on public benefits as they work two or sometimes three jobs, commute extraordinary distances, participate in job training programs – all to put a roof over their children’s heads and food on the table.  They are resilient, strong, and 100 percent committed to making a better life for themselveNG Foods and their families.   And yes, food stamps enable them to just about get by, if you can call it that.

And so I thought it was important for me and other leaders in the community to get a glimpse – and believe me I know it’s only a glimpse – into the challenges so many in our region and our country face.  By participating in the Food Stamp Challenge and eating only what I can buy with a food stamp budget for a week, I hope to shine a spotlight on the importance of programs like the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (the official name for the food stamp program), while at the same time highlighting how supports like these are not a panacea; in spite of this assistance, the barriers that so many women and families face in our region remain very high and very challenging.

I’ll let you know how it goes.

Nicky Goren is president of Washington Area Women’s Foundation.

Food Stamp Challenge: Day Two

This week, several members of The Women’s Foundation staff are participating in the Food Stamp Challenge, an exercise organized by D.C. Hunger Solutions that educates the public and raises awareness of the benefits of food stamps and the challenges recipients face while eating on a very limited budget. The staff will be sharing their experiences on this blog.

After a fairly uneventful first day of the Food Stamp Challenge, I woke up a little hungry on day two. Yesterday started off with a banana and water for breakfast. That’s actually more than I normally have since I’m not a breakfast person, but I figured I should get something into my system to help me get through the day, especially since I didn’t have my morning caffeine!

For lunch I had a very small salad that consisted of lettuce and chickpeas. I find that I’m rationing my food a bit—eyeballing my lettuce to try to determine just how many salads and of what size I can make between now and October 15th. I have two tomatoes, but I didn’t want to use an entire tomato on the first day, so I opted to save it for later.

I cooked brown rice and a veggie stir fry of broccoli, carrots, and green beans for dinner. I also added a small salad (this time with tomatoes). I’ll admit I did have a glass of wine with dinner! This was not part of my budget, and in fact you cannot use food stamps to purchase alcohol.

What was most interesting about the first day was the conversation that the staff of The Women’s Foundation engaged in during our staff meeting. Four of us are undertaking the challenge—two of us on our own, and the other two with their families.

One staff member felt hungry earlier in the morning and had already eaten half of her lunch, despite the fact that she normally doesn’t eat breakfast. She thought there was a psychological aspect to it because her day hadn’t started any differently from a normal day for her.

Another staff member was excited about the meals she planned because she was cooking food from her native country of Ghana. She didn’t feel as if she was making a huge sacrifice – the meals felt like comfort food to her – although she was very aware of how expensive certain things were when she shopped (like eggs for example), and she was hungry later in the day.

Another staff member felt it was much easier to do the challenge with multiple people because she had more money to spend ($30 per person) and could buy certain things in bulk. I was jealous of the eight pounds of apples she bought for $8!

Each of us also reflected on the “luxuries” we had as we did our shopping, the first being transportation to easily get us to the grocery store at whatever time of the day of night we needed to go. Additionally, the four of us live in Northern Virginia where we have access to a multitude of grocery stores and markets. One staff person shopped around for the best deals and as a result ended up shopping at several different stores.

It was a stark reminder that many living in our region do not have these “luxuries.” According to new data from DC Kids Count, one-third of DC neighborhood clusters do not have a grocery store. Of these neighborhoods, nearly half have child poverty rates above 50 percent. So where do these families shop, and what are they buying?

Jennifer Lockwood-Shabat is vice president of The Women’s Foundation.

Food Stamp Challenge: Day One

LockwoodShabat_FoodThis week, several members of The Women’s Foundation staff are participating in the Food Stamp Challenge, an exercise organized by D.C. Hunger Solutions that educates the public and raises awareness of the benefits of food stamps and the challenges recipients face while eating on a very limited budget. The staff will be sharing their experiences on this blog.

Today I officially start the Food Stamp Challenge, but my week-long journey began last night with my trip to the grocery store to purchase my food. On a budget of $30 for the week (the average weekly food stamp benefit in the District of Columbia), I armed myself with a list of what I thought I could reasonably buy for $30. My complicating factors are that I’m a vegetarian, and I have a number of food allergies. Also, I have a small addiction to Mountain Dew (my only vice, my source of caffeine every morning), but I was pretty sure that my budget would not allow for this luxury.

My younger daughter (age 9) accompanied me to the grocery store. Her task: keep me on budget by adding everything up on the calculator. We started in the fruits and vegetables section at our local Giant. Because of my allergies, I have always purchased only organic fruits and vegetables, but I knew that would not be possible on my budget.

I carefully searched through the produce. I knew that I wanted to get some things to make fresh salads throughout the week. At roughly $4.00, my usual organic baby spinach was out of the question. Instead I purchased two bags of “Veggie Medley” lettuce that included shredded carrots and radishes, thinking that the “extra” veggies might come in handy. Additionally, they were on sale—buy one get one free!

It took me substantially longer to make my way through the produce section because I had to weigh and calculate the price of every fruit and vegetable that I picked up. Sometimes I had to put things back (like the single yellow pepper that was $2.51), and sometimes I could add a little more (another broccoli crown because they were on sale). Luckily, the electronic scales made calculating the weight and price very easy.  However, human error caused another delay when my daughter made a mistake in entering a price in the calculator so we had to take everything out, reweigh and recalculate the price.

After finishing with my produce shopping, I then added pasta, rice, chickpeas, and spaghetti sauce to my cart. Each time, I was looking for the cheapest price. I was pleasantly surprised that one of my favorite spaghetti sauces was on sale so I was able to get something that I knew that I liked and tasted good.

I had really wanted to get some milk and cheese, but I also wanted veggie burgers to add some protein and “heft” to a few of my meals. At $4.19, the veggie burgers took me very close to my total budget. It took me a few minutes to make a decision, staring at the food in my cart and trying to calculate how this was going to work. In the end, I opted to forgo the milk and get the veggie burgers instead.

My final tally in the check-out line was $27.55. I had $2.45 to spare. My daughter asked if I wanted to go back and get something else. In a split second, I couldn’t decide what that final item would be and then I worried about whether that one extra item would put me over. I decided to stick with my purchases, and save the $2.45 for an emergency.  Cans of Mountain Dew are only 75 cents from the woman on the street corner by my office. I might be able to purchase a couple for those moments when I’m desperate…

Jennifer Lockwood-Shabat is vice president of The Women’s Foundation.

Why We Need More Conversations About Higher Ed Options

Graduation caps and gowns Bien StephensonIn New York City this week, NBC’s third annual Education Nation summit was held, featuring three days of panel discussions with the nation’s leading experts on education, including former and current secretaries of education, educators, and policy makers. A lot of great resources, including case studies and videos are posted on the Education Nation website, and I’m still working my way through them. There’s one topic, however, that I’ve been searching for and haven’t been able to find yet – a discussion on the impact of community colleges on low-income students.

It’s a topic that’s been at the forefront of my mind in the past few weeks – ever since the Republican and Democratic National Conventions, when both Ann Romney and Michelle Obama talked about the costs of college. Romney spoke about how much more difficult it is in the current economic climate to save money for college. The First Lady recalled being “so young, so in love and so in debt” from student loans when she and President Obama were first married.

Given those facts, I think that it’s important to have more conversations about the far less terrifying alternatives out there than tens of thousands of dollars in student loan debt. Community colleges often offer affordable options for students for whom massive loans may not be a possibility. In addition to being lower in cost, community colleges provide adult learners with the skills and credentials they need to improve their career and earnings prospects, or prepare them to spend a shorter time in traditional four-year schools.

Nationwide, the average annual tuition and fees at community colleges was just over $2,900; tuition and fees at four-year colleges averages about $8,200. Encouraging students, families and the government to invest resources into community college degree programs with career potential will open doors for students who may not have otherwise have pursued an education beyond high school.

According to the American Association of Community Colleges, these schools “are the gateway to postsecondary education for many minority, low income, and first-generation postsecondary education students.” These institutions are particularly valuable for women, who make up the majority of community college students (57 percent) nationwide. The Institute for Women’s Policy Research, a Women’s Foundation Grantee Partner, notes that for single mothers, “postsecondary degrees with high labor market value are especially valuable for ensuring family economic security and future opportunities for their children.”

And a local student summed it up best, telling The Women’s Foundation: “my daughter motivates me to finish college because if she sees what her mother has done then she will probably follow in my footsteps.”

Everyone seems to be in agreement that, these days, it’s important to have some sort of post-secondary education or additional training in order to sustain families in careers where there’s room for growth. However, there are multiple paths for getting there and not all of them lead to a mountain of student loan debt.

Witness to Olympic History

120810-US_Olympic_women_relayEarlier this month, I had the great privilege and opportunity to attend the London Olympic Games — fulfilling my lifelong dream of seeing the Olympics and having the chance to do so in the city in which I grew up.  It was truly the experience of a lifetime, and not just because I’m a lifelong athlete and sports fan. These games were historic in many ways, particularly for women, and it was truly an honor to witness them live. As the festivities in London continue with the start of the Paralympics this week, I wanted to share with you five observations about these games.

5.  I’m proud to say that London carried out its role as host admirably.  Our experience as attendees was stress-free, the transportation system worked perfectly, and the organizers had clearly put a lot of thought into the logistics.

4.  While I admire Britain’s National Health Service, and was a frequent user of those services as an accident-prone child and teenager, I’m not sure they deserved quite so prominent a role in the opening ceremony.  Just saying.

3.  It was interesting to learn how, for so many athletes, both here and abroad, winning an Olympic medal would change their lives forever, and in many cases, help lift them and their families out of poverty.

2.  It was equally interesting to learn about how many athletes in the US live at or below the poverty line. Few make enough money through sports to support themselves, and the US Olympics Committee – a 501(c)(3) – does not raise enough to sponsor every athlete.

1.  In so many ways, this Olympics was about the rise of women in sports, though it was still clear that there is, in some places, a long way to go (one example being the stories about the Japanese and Australian women’s teams travelling coach on the same plane as the men’s teams, who flew business class).  For Team USA, women ruled, winning 59 of the total 104 medals, and 29 of the 46 Gold medals won by the US team.  This was also the first time in history that the US sent more women athletes to the Olympics than men. The successful turnout has been attributed, in part, to Title IX.  An increase in women’s sports at the Olympics also led to every country present having at least one woman on the team for the first time ever.

We do have a way to go to ensure that male and female athletes are on equal footing when it comes to sponsorships and ticket sales. Increasing opportunity, interest and visibility is a wonderful thing – and not just for female athletes. A fundamental shift in sports can lead to more prospects and confidence for women and girls in all areas. Seeing a woman with talent and a dream holding up a gold medal on a podium in London makes so many more things seem possible.

Nicky is president of Washington Area Women’s Foundation.

Be Inspired at the 2012 Leadership Luncheon

With just two months to go before the annual Leadership Luncheon, Washington Area Women’s Foundation is gearing up for another great opportunity to connect with the community and share how, together, we can transform the lives of women and girls, the DC region, and the world! In this interview on Comcast Newsmakers, Foundation President Nicky Goren gives us a sneak peek at this inspiring and informative event.

For more information on sponsorship opportunities, please click here. And to be notified when individual tickets go on sale, be sure to sign up for our e-newsletter by clicking here.

Affordable Care Act a Victory for Economically Vulnerable Women

Today’s historic Supreme Court ruling upholding the Affordable Care Act is a victory for women and particularly significant for economically vulnerable women and their children. In the coming years it will be an important tool in improving their health and economic security.

Under the Affordable Care Act:

  • Women will pay lower health care costs. According to healthcare.gov, “before the law, women could be charged more for individual insurance policies simply because of their gender. A 22-year-old woman could be charged 150% the premium that a 22-year-old man paid.”
  • Insurance companies can’t deny coverage to women who have pre-existing conditions like cancer or to women who have been pregnant.
  • Women will have the freedom to choose their primary care provider, OB-GYB or pediatrician in their health plan’s network without a referral.
  • Women will be able to receive preventative care without co-pays. Services like mammograms, new baby care and well-child visits won’t have to be paid out of pocket.
  • Health care plans will include maternity care.
  • Medicaid coverage will be expanded to cover families up to 133 percent of poverty and health insurance subsidies will be provided to help pay premiums and out-of-pocket costs for families with incomes up to 400 percent of poverty.

While health insurance coverage is important for us all, it is especially critical to low-income women and their families. Women with incomes below the poverty line are much less likely to be insured than others and women of color are also at a disadvantage when it comes to coverage. Latinas have the lowest levels of coverage in our region – in Prince George’s County, for example, fewer than seven in ten Latinas have health insurance.

The Supreme Court’s ruling made me so optimistic. Days like this make all of our aspirations seem possible and put us one step closer to our vision: a country where everyone – regardless of their gender, race or income – has access to the resources and opportunities that will enable them to thrive.

Nicky Goren is president of Washington Area Women’s Foundation.